UN investigator Agnes Callamard, who wrote a report setting out ‘credible evidence’ of Prince Mohammed’s involvement, today labelled the Saudi inquiry a ‘travesty’.
‘The travesty of investigation, prosecution and justice continues,’ Callamard wrote on Twitter.
Amnesty International described the verdicts a ‘whitewash’, pointing out that the kingdom had a record of ‘grossly unfair trials’.
‘This verdict is a whitewash which brings neither justice nor the truth for Jamal Khashoggi and his loved ones,’ spokesperson Lynn Maalouf said.
‘The trial has been closed to the public and to independent monitors, with no information available as to how the investigation was carried out.
‘The verdict fails to address the Saudi authorities’ involvement in this devastating crime or clarify the location of Jamal Khashoggi’s remains.’
Turkey also criticized today’s verdicts, saying key aspects of the case such as the location of Khashoggi’s body were ‘left in the dark’.
The decision ‘far from meets the expectations of both our country and the international community to shed light on the murder with all its dimensions and deliver justice,’ the Turkish foreign ministry said.
Christophe Deloire of Reporters Without Borders said: ‘When Saudis sentence five to death for Khashoggi’s murder, we fear that it is a way to silence them for ever and to conceal the truth.
‘We cannot consider death penalty helps to bring justice. We still expect a full accounting.’
Saudi investigators also claimed that the killing was ‘not premeditated’, contradicting the findings of the UN report.

Shalaan al-Shalaan, [photo], the deputy public prosecutor of Saudi Arabia, claimed that ‘the decision [to kill Khashoggi] was taken at the spur of the moment’ – That when the killers saw that it would be impossible to transfer Khashoggi to a safe place to negotiate with him, they decided to kill him

Prosecution spokesman Shalaan al-Shalaan claimed that ‘the decision [to kill Khashoggi] was taken at the spur of the moment’.
He claimed that when the killers saw that it would be impossible to transfer the journalist to a safe place to negotiate with him, they decided to kill him.
‘It was agreed, in consultation between the head of the negotiating team and the culprits, to kill Jamal Khashoggi inside the consulate,’ Shalaan said in response to questions from journalists.
According to state TV, an investigation by the Saudi attorney general found insufficient evidence against al-Qahtani and he was not charged.
However, al-Qahtani has been sanctioned in the United States for his alleged role in the operation. al-Qahtani allegedly,  ‘was part of the planning and execution of the operation’ to kill Khashoggi.
Qahtani has not appeared in public since Khashoggi’s murder and his current whereabouts are unknown.
The Saudi consul-general in Istanbul at the time, Mohammed al-Otaibi, was found not guilty and released from prison.

‘The court issued death sentences on five men who directly took part in the killing,’ the prosecutor said in a statement.
Another three men were jailed for a combined total of 24 years ‘for their role in covering up this crime and violating the law’, the kingdom announced, while three of the 11 people on trial were found not guilty.
The names of the suspects were not released, but are believed to include intelligence operative Maher Mutreb who frequently traveled with the crown prince on foreign tours.
Forensic expert Salah al-Tubaigy and Fahad al-Balawi, a member of the Saudi royal guard, were also said to be among the suspects.
The trials were carried out in almost total secrecy, although a handful of diplomats as well as members of Khashoggi’s family were allowed in. Nine sessions were held at the criminal court in Riyadh.
The attorney general’s office said today it is looking into the verdicts to see whether to move ahead in the appellate court.

A UN probe found that a team of 15 Saudi agents were flown specifically to Turkey to meet Khashoggi that day inside the consulate.
They included a forensic doctor, intelligence and security officers and individuals who worked for the crown prince’s office.
An audio recording of Khashoggi’s last moments, which has been heard by UN investigators, apparently reveals how the alleged Saudi ‘hit squad’ accosted Khashoggi who died amid ‘sounds of a struggle’.
His remains were never found, but it is believed that Khashoggi’s killers dismembered his body and removed it from the consulate.
Riyadh offered a variety of explanations for Khashoggi’s disappearance, which helped to fuel suspicion that the prince was behind the operation.
The Saudis initially denied any knowledge of what happened, insisting for weeks that Khashoggi had walked out of the consulate alive.
After finally acknowledging that he had died in the building, Saudi officials then claimed he had died accidentally during a brawl.
Changing tack again, the Saudis finally admitted the journalist was murdered, charged 11 people but denied that the prince had been involved.

However, a UN report published in June said there was ‘credible evidence’ linking the crown prince to the killing.
In a 99-page report, the UN’s special investigator Agnes Callamard said experts found it ‘inconceivable’ that a sophisticated 15-man mission to kill Khashoggi could have happened without Prince Mohammed’s knowledge.
Two of the alleged hit squad had used diplomatic passports, and that the encounter at the consulate was ‘only possible because of the pretense of government service’, she said.
Prince Mohammed had allowed a wide-ranging crackdown on journalists and regime opponents in the past, she said.
On top of that, she said Saudi officials ‘multiple steps apparently designed to destroy evidence’ after Khashoggi’s death.
Callamard also warned that the search for justice must not be left to the Saudi judicial system, which is ‘so vulnerable to political interference.’
In an interview in September this year, Prince Mohammed said he took ‘full responsibility’ for Khashoggi’s death, but denied that he ordered the murder.