Site icon KonnieMoments

Strange world! German woman’s bid for hotel to give up male escort’s identity after he got her pregnant during a three-night binge seven years ago -thrown out by court

&Tab;&Tab;<div class&equals;"wpcnt">&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;<div class&equals;"wpa">&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;<span class&equals;"wpa-about">Advertisements<&sol;span>&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;<div class&equals;"u top&lowbar;amp">&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;<amp-ad width&equals;"300" height&equals;"265"&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab; type&equals;"pubmine"&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab; data-siteid&equals;"109460728"&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab; data-section&equals;"1">&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;<&sol;amp-ad>&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;<&sol;div>&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;<&sol;div>&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;<&sol;div><div class&equals;"billboard&lowbar;wrapper relative">&NewLine;<div id&equals;"billBoard" class&equals;"adHolder billboard affix-off affix-past-parent">&NewLine;<h3><span style&equals;"color&colon;&num;808080&semi;"><em>&&num;8216&semi;Huge buyer&&num;8217&semi;s remorse &&num;8211&semi; The question is which of the &&num;8216&semi;Michaels&&num;8217&semi; providing service at establishment at the time was her provider &quest;&&num;8217&semi;<&sol;em><&sol;span><&sol;h3>&NewLine;<h6><span style&equals;"color&colon;&num;1a0101&semi;">German woman loses paternity suit to establish the identity of her child&&num;8217&semi;s father<&sol;span><&sol;h6>&NewLine;<h6><span style&equals;"color&colon;&num;1a0101&semi;">She was a cash paying Joan who found herself pregnant after a three-night romp with male escort at a hotel in Halle &comma; Germany&comma; back in 2010 <&sol;span><&sol;h6>&NewLine;<&sol;div>&NewLine;<&sol;div>&NewLine;<div>&NewLine;<div class&equals;"articleWide cleared">&NewLine;<div class&equals;"alpha">&NewLine;<div id&equals;"js-article-text" class&equals;"article-text wide">&NewLine;<h6><span style&equals;"color&colon;&num;1a0101&semi;">She now has a 7-year-old son&comma; Joel&comma; from the escort whom she only knew briefly as &&num;8216&semi;Michael&&num;8217&semi;&comma; but couldn&&num;8217&semi;t remember much else<&sol;span><&sol;h6>&NewLine;<h6><span style&equals;"color&colon;&num;1a0101&semi;">Seven years later&comma; she&&num;8217&semi;s now seeking child support for the fruit of the three nights she purchased<&sol;span><&sol;h6>&NewLine;<h6><span style&equals;"color&colon;&num;1a0101&semi;">She petitioned the hotel that hosted her &&num;8216&semi;sexvacation&&num;8217&semi;&comma;  to get her escort&&num;8217&semi;s full identity <&sol;span><&sol;h6>&NewLine;<h6><span style&equals;"color&colon;&num;1a0101&semi;">Request denied&comma; she sued to compel the hotel&comma; to release the man&&num;8217&semi;s identity<&sol;span><&sol;h6>&NewLine;<h6><span style&equals;"color&colon;&num;1a0101&semi;">Throwing out her suit&comma; the court said the woman was playing &&num;8216&semi;father roulette&&num;8217&semi; and ruled the man&&num;8217&semi;s right to privacy outweighed her right to know the father of her child<&sol;span><&sol;h6>&NewLine;<div id&equals;"articleIconLinksContainer">&NewLine;<div class&equals;"mol-img">&NewLine;<div class&equals;"image-wrap fff-pic">&NewLine;<div class&equals;"overlay-icon mobile-gallery">&NewLine;<div class&equals;"mobile-gallery-icon">A German mother sued a hotel chain&comma; unsuccessfully&comma; to obtain the identity of &&num;8216&semi;Michael&&num;8217&semi;&comma; a male escort whose service she used&comma; while lodged at one of their establishments in Halle&comma; Germany&comma; back in 2010&period; The escort left her with a nice surprise and she gave birth to a son nine months later&period;<br &sol;>&NewLine;She has since been trying to establish his identity so she can file for child support allowance&period;<&sol;div>&NewLine;<&sol;div>&NewLine;<&sol;div>&NewLine;<&sol;div>&NewLine;<&sol;div>&NewLine;<div>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"mol-para-with-font">The woman whose identity is not revealed&comma; sued the hotel chain in a bid to uncover the identity of a male escort who got her pregnant in furtherance of her paternity suit&period; She lost her case&comma; after the court upheld the hotel&&num;8217&semi;s decision to withhold male escort&&num;8217&semi;s data from the paternity suit filed by the woman&period;<br &sol;>&NewLine;In her paternity suit&comma; the woman&comma;&comma; claimed she fell pregnant during a three-night romp with a sex worker she knew only as &&num;8216&semi;Michael&&num;8217&semi; at a hotel in Halle in 2010&period;<br &sol;>&NewLine;Nine months later she gave birth to son Joel&comma; and had been attempting to track down &&num;8216&semi;Michael&&num;8217&semi; in order to claim a support allowance&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<h6 class&equals;"author-section byline-plain"><strong><img class&equals;"alignnone size-full wp-image-176237" src&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;konniemoments&period;com&sol;wp-content&sol;uploads&sol;2017&sol;05&sol;german-escort-paternity-suit2&period;jpg" alt&equals;"German escort paternity suit2&period;jpg" width&equals;"736" height&equals;"1054" &sol;>I paid you&comma; now you it&&num;8217&semi;s your turn to pay&colon; The former Joan is now seeking child support from the male escort she used 7 years ago<&sol;strong><&sol;h6>&NewLine;<div id&equals;"articleIconLinksContainer"> But a court in Munich has ruled the hotel chain does not have to give up the escort&&num;8217&semi;s identity&comma; saying the woman was playing &&num;8216&semi;father roulette&&num;8217&semi;&period;<br &sol;>&NewLine;Given that she knew him as &&num;8220&semi;Michael&&num;8221&semi;&comma;  but several men with the same name stayed at the hotel at the time&period; The court ruled that each of the four Michaels had a right to &&num;8220&semi;control their own data and protect their own marriage and family&&num;8221&semi;&comma; the ruling said&period;<br &sol;>&NewLine;The case was heard at the Munich District Court because the hotel chain is based in the Bavarian city&period; Halle is in eastern Germany&period;<br &sol;>&NewLine;The woman &&num;8211&semi; not named in the case &&num;8211&semi; said she had got pregnant after staying with &&num;8220&semi;Michael&&num;8221&semi; in a room on the second floor&period; She now has a seven-year-old son called Joel&period;<br &sol;>&NewLine;The court decided that her lack of detail about the man raised the risk of personal data &&num;8220&semi;simply being released at random&&num;8221&semi;&period;<br &sol;>&NewLine;&&num;8220&semi;Nor is it certain that the Christian name is indeed the name of the man in question&comma;&&num;8221&semi; the court said&period;<br &sol;>&NewLine;There were three other Michaels staying at the hotel on the night in question&comma; and the court decided that it could not sanction giving out their details &&num;8216&semi;at random&&num;8217&semi;&period;<br &sol;>&NewLine;&&num;8216&semi;Nor is it certain that the Christian name is indeed the name of the man in question&comma;&&num;8217&semi; the court added&comma; according to the <a class&equals;"" href&equals;"http&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;bbc&period;co&period;uk&sol;news&sol;world-europe-39777609" target&equals;"&lowbar;blank" rel&equals;"nofollow noopener noreferrer">BBC<&sol;a>&period;<br &sol;>&NewLine;A Munich court ruled that the secret lover remain secret&period; In shutting down the fishing expedition and upholding the right to privacy&comma; the court said the man&&num;8217&semi;s right to privacy outweighed the mother&&num;8217&semi;s right to know the father&comma; especially since there was no certainty Michael was his real name&period;<br &sol;>&NewLine;The woman&&num;8217&semi;s vague descriptions of the man also harmed her case&comma; the court said&period;<br &sol;>&NewLine;A Munich court ruled that the secret lover remain secret&period; In shutting down the fishing expedition and upholding the right to privacy&comma; the court said the man&&num;8217&semi;s right to privacy outweighed the mother&&num;8217&semi;s right to know the father&comma; especially since there was no certainty Michael was his real name&period;<br &sol;>&NewLine;Explaining the ruling&comma; justices said&colon; &&num;8216&semi;The rights of the affected man and the protection of his marriage and family override the rights of the applicant&period;<br &sol;>&NewLine;&&num;8216&semi;Men have a right to privacy and intimacy&&num;8230&semi; that protects them from having to reveal their sexual relations&period;&&num;8217&semi;<br &sol;>&NewLine;An appeals court in Munich&comma; where the hotel chain is based&comma; also declined to review the decision and threw its weight behind the original verdict&period;<&sol;div>&NewLine;<&sol;div>&NewLine;<&sol;div>&NewLine;<&sol;div>&NewLine;<&sol;div>&NewLine;<&sol;div>&NewLine;<p>&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version